Trends in pediatric CNS tumors in Armenia: a multicenter retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Central nervous system (CNS) tumors are the most common solid malignancies in children worldwide, including in Armenia. The current study aims to analyze epidemiological data, treatment, and outcomes of children and young adults (≤25 years) with CNS tumors in Armenia during the last 26 years. METHODS: We collected data from pediatric and young adult patients treated in selected sites in Armenia from 1st January 1995 to 31st December 2020. Incidence by sex, age at diagnosis, time from first complaints to diagnosis, histopathology results, treatment strategies, complications, and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated. RESULTS: The multicenter data analysis revealed 149 patients with diagnosed primary CNS tumors over 26 years. Among them, 84 (56.4%) were male. The median age at diagnosis was 7 years (range, 3 months to 25 years), and the median time from the first complaints to diagnosis was 2 months (range, 1 week to 70 months). Medulloblastomas and other embryonal tumors (47), low-grade gliomas (32), and high-grade gliomas (22) were the most commonly diagnosed malignancies. Ependymomas, craniopharyngiomas, germ cell tumors, and other malignancies were observed in 22 patients. For 26 patients, no histopathological or radiological diagnosis was available. Follow-up information was available for 98 (65.8%) patients. The 5-year OS rate for the whole study group was 67.7%. CONCLUSION: Consistent with international data, embryonal tumors, and gliomas were the most commonly diagnosed CNS malignancies in Armenia. Multimodal treatment was often not available in Armenia during the study period, especially for early cases.

Disparities in the consensus for treatment of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia.

Introduction: Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is an arduous complication of chemotherapy to be dealt with, and there are many unmet needs in this field to be addressed on the global front. We have conducted this study to contribute to the understanding of existing knowledge gaps of CIT management and highlight the direction to focus future investigations. Methods: This was an academic single-institution report on a cross-sectional study evaluating CIT management practices using platelet (PLT) transfusions by haematologists and oncologists in Armenia. Results: Physicians' opinions differed significantly when it came to defining thrombocytopenia by PLT levels. 13.2% of those surveyed considered thrombocytopenia to be when PLT counts fall below 180 × 109/L, 42.1% defined thrombocytopenia to have a PLT threshold of 150 × 109/L, 15.8% and 21.0% specialists setting their thresholds at 140 × 109/L and 100 × 109/L, respectively.All physicians managed CIT by performing PLT transfusions for prophylactic purposes (i.e., when PLT count falls below a certain threshold) with none of them transfusing PLTs only on-demand to address active bleeding. 73.3% haematologists (adult), 57.1% medical oncologists, and 50% paediatricians deemed 10 × 109/L as the threshold PLT count for transfusing afebrile patients with haematologic malignancies (besides acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL)) and solid tumours.PLT products availability varied among the respondents, with only 53% of them responding that they had 24/7 access. Conclusion: CIT is a complication of interest to physicians worldwide and has not been resolved yet. This is the first conducted survey regarding CIT and the initial step for further research.